Reader: Pot edibles hater Maureen Dowd should stick with what she knows — booze and pills

Our recent post about New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd's bad experience with pot edibles, which she suggested be stamped with a skull and bones (maybe a joke, maybe not), got a lot of folks talking. Here's a comment from a reader who thinks Dowd may be better off using...
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Our recent post about New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd’s bad experience with pot edibles, which she suggested be stamped with a skull and bones (maybe a joke, maybe not), got a lot of folks talking. Here’s a comment from a reader who thinks Dowd may be better off using substances that are more familiar to her in the future.

Shari Walsh writes:

Edibles are an alternate way to consume marijuana. On the ones I have purchased, there is an advisory to wait one to two hours for the effects. There is also a guide on what one portion is and the dosage of THC in it. I can read. It seems pretty simple to me. Candy is dandy, but liquor is quicker. Maybe she just stick to what she knows…alcohol and prescription drugs.

Keep Westword Free

We’re $2,500 away from our spring campaign goal!
We’re aiming to raise $20,000. Your support ensures Westword can continue watching out for you and our community. No paywall. Always accessible. Daily online and weekly in print.

$20,000

Send your story tips to the author, Michael Roberts.

For more memorable takes, visit our Comment of the Day archive.

Loading latest posts...